Now You See Me review

Now You See Me review 3 bananas: recommended!

Have there been many films where a group of magi­cians use their skills of mis­dir­ec­tion to per­form bank heists? I don’t remem­ber too many to be hon­est, if any at all. There’s prob­ably a few, I don’t doubt it. But cer­tainly none that stick in my recent memory. And cer­tainly not of the huge block­buster variety.

Now You See Me taps into this rich vein. How­ever, not all magic tricks could be con­sidered use­ful for rob­bing a bank. For instance, I’m not sure David Blaine sit­ting in a trans­par­ent box, sus­pen­ded above Lon­don for 44 days, and try­ing to hold his piss and shit in (whilst unim­pressed Lon­don­ers shout obscen­it­ies and throw eggs, saus­ages, bacon and beer cans at him), qualifies.

Nope, the magi­cians in Now You See Me are more your David Cop­per­field type. There’s four of them. The ginger girl from Home and Away, the bar­man from Cheers, that guy from the Face­book movie, and James Franco’s less suc­cess­ful brother.


Together, the four of them form the mighty magical team, “The Four Horse­men” (even though one of them is obvi­ously a girl). But there’s also a fifth mys­ter­i­ous horse­man, someone work­ing from the shad­ows, who brings the other four together using four call­ing cards, some flashy lights, a fog machine, and the plans for some dar­ing magical heists that will leave the world gasp­ing, and the FBI clutch­ing at straws.

It gets off to a bold start. The team’s first live trick involves tele­port­ing someone all the way from Las Vegas to the inside of a bank vault in Paris, in front of a live stu­dio audi­ence. It has the clas­sic “How the hell did they do that?” feel of some of the world’s most auda­cious tricks. Luck­ily, it does get explained, but not straight away. The task of puzz­ling it out falls to FBI agent, Dylan Rhodes (Mark Ruf­falo) and sexy Inter­pol agent, Alma Dray (Melanie Laurent).

But is every­one as they seem? Who exactly is the fifth horse­man? Per­haps to the film’s det­ri­ment, the film switches focus away from the four magi­cians — and onto the FBI team try­ing to catch them — for a large chunk of the movie. The magi­cians aren’t explored in any great depth, but I sup­pose this helps main­tain an air of mys­tery, of the sort that the best real world trick­sters strive for. I just feel The Four Horse­men were a bit too enig­matic, only appear­ing now and again to give the FBI someone to chase.


Admit­tedly, the chases are pretty excit­ing. Louis Leter­rier dir­ects the action well, keep­ing it fast, but never con­fus­ing. Although, he does have a tend­ency to get car­ried away by hav­ing someone stand still, with the cam­era sweep­ing around them in a full 360, per­haps once too often.

The film fal­ters in the third act, with the final trick not seem­ing like much of a trick at all: the huge, flashy build up mak­ing it feel a bit anti-climatic. By this point though, it’s less about the tricks and more about what the twist is going to be. It’s a big one, that might have you ques­tion­ing every massive plot hole that opens up because of it. I think though, that the film devel­ops just the right amount of good will before the reveal, that it doesn’t really mat­ter too much.

I enjoyed it a lot. It’s a great way to pass the time. It’s fun, loud, flashy, and dumb, but also a bit for­get­table. It doesn’t quite hit the heights that it could have. But it’s still bet­ter than watch­ing David Blaine try­ing not to shit in a box.

BANANA RATING: 3 out of 5


  1. theipc says:

    The end of this post is a thing of amaz­ingly beautiful-ness!

  2. Spot on review here mate. And that’d be a good idea for a post — Films worse than watch­ing David Blaine try­ing not to shit in a box :)

  3. Nick Powell says:

    I had hope for you Mon­key­boy… I thought you’d hate this one. One of my least favor­ite of the year. The third act, which you men­tion fal­ters, com­pletely ruined it for me. And I dis­agree with you at the end, I’d much rather have David Blaine shit in a box.


    • Monkeyboy says:

      I was sur­prised I didn’t hate it, to be hon­est. Don’t get me wrong, I didn’t love it, but I found it pretty enjoy­able des­pite some of the rather large plot holes. Sorry to dis­ap­point you! haha. :)

  4. Smash says:

    I was dis­ap­poin­ted in this one. And you iden­ti­fied all of the things that left me feel­ing blah about it. Focus­sing too much of the screen time on the FBI, dis­ap­point­ing final magic trick, gap­ing plot holes, you’ve covered them all.
    But sav­ing the day for me is your delight­ful review. I like that you didn’t evis­cer­ate it. Because while I’ll prob­ably never watch this one again, watch­ing it was a rel­at­ively enjoy­able way to spend my afternoon.

    • Monkeyboy says:

      Yep, agree with you that they focus a bit too much on the FBI, Smash. Never really thought the FBI would be the lead char­ac­ters, judging by the trail­ers, from what I remem­ber. Glad you found the review delight­ful! I couldn’t remem­ber what “evis­cer­ate” meant though, had to look it up. Knew it was pain­ful how­ever, haha. :)

  5. CMrok93 says:

    Good review. This movie had me going for quite some time, and then just totally pissed me off with its cheap-ass end­ing. I’m fine with some­thing not mak­ing sense, but this was just dumb for the sake of being dumb.

    • Monkeyboy says:

      Yeah, I can see how you might not like the end­ing. It could have been bet­ter, and it did stretch cred­ib­il­ity a bit. Usu­ally, I would mark a film lower because of that. But I guess we don’t really get a lot of films with magi­cians in them, and I think that’s why I found it a fun ride. Although, a bit of a for­get­table one.

  6. I liked the bar man from Cheers com­ment. 4 ran­dom ass people try­ing to be magi­cians and some cops. WTF just happened in this movie and why!

Leave a Comment